Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

Tomasz Wolny

Tomasz Wolny

The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education,Katowice, Poland

Title: Efficacy of neurodynamic techniques in comparison with “sham” therapy in the carpal tunnel syndrome – a preliminary study

Biography

Biography: Tomasz Wolny

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compared the efficacy of neurodynamic techniques, with “sham” therapy in the mild and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Methods: The study included 39 CTS patients (the average age 53.2; SD=11.5) who were randomly assigned to the NT group (neurodynamic techniques) or to the CG group (“sham” neurodynamic techniques). Nerve conduction study (NCS), pain severity (NPRS), symptom severity (SSS) and functional status (FSS) (Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire - BCTQ) were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Therapy was conducted twice weekly and both groups received 10 therapy sessions. In the statistical analysis, the ANOVA model was used, supplemented with a post hoc test (p level 0.05).

 

Results: : A baseline assessment revealed no group differences in NCS, NPRS, SSS and FSS (in all cases p>0.05). Four weeks after the last treatment procedure, nerve conduction was examined again. In the NT group, median nerve sensory conduction velocity increased by 53%, motor conduction velocity by 10%, distal motor latency was decreased by 30% (in all cases, p<0.001). There were no significantly changes in NCS of median nerve in the CG group. Immediately after therapy were evaluated NPRS, SSS and FSS. In the MT group NPRS decreased by 308%, SSS decreased by 72% and FSS increased by 49%. There were no significantly changes in NPRS, SSS and FSS in the CG.

Conclusion: Neurodynamic techniques had a positive effect on NCS, NPRS, SSS and FSS as compared with “sham” therapy  in the mild and moderate CTS patients.